|
Ah, I see that this particular forum discussion has been discussed few months ago – August 2007, and this is now November. I don’t think people will come back and continue to discuss it.
However, I am remain hopeful that original poster and perhaps Chad from Blurb confirm this. I would like to know if ABILLC or Jingothecat, or anyone else (who has done a custom full-bleed design with InDesign—then export InDesign document as PDF, and then open it in Photoshop and save all the work as JPG) and that those who (as few others above, and myself) has had discovered problem with “fuzzy, jazzy” result on BookSmart application.
I am in middle of finalize the final stage of BookSmart by incorporating Photoshop/InDesign piece.
Can anyone offer a couple of snapshot of those fuzzy look on BookSmart application AND the result on Blurb book that is published. I want to see some solid evidence if printing works out nicely regardless of hiccup going on with Blurb Booksmart application.
Chad, I see that Blurb has released 1.9.1 only few weeks ago, and there is same bug problem and reported here. And I realize that I see that Blurb already released 1.9.2, and I don’t think itself resolve a problem related to what we are seeing with funny behavior associated with Photoshop JPG files on BookSmart.
I will file a feature enhancement request to address this issue. I suspect that individuals like myself who use InDesign (and Photoshop) working with customized full-bleed design project, and that we’ll be seeing the same old bug problem all over again. It would be nice if Blurb software engineering team work on this horrible bug problem. It is truly important that it must be addressed promptly, the better.
Because I spent lot of hours, energy and with all toolbox I have, BookSmart is impossible to work with. I almost gave up, just barely.
Perhaps that Blurb should set up a special advisory team that works with software engineers and advise them to do what see fits and all. I know that not every feature enhancement would be met on timely basis, but THIS feature request MUST be under consideration now, the better.
I’ll write a couple of feature enhancement requests and push the Blurb team to the envelope and hope for the best. And I think that Blurb software engineering team should invite some selected individual participants as “alpha testers” and report back the bug back to software engineering team and work on removing bug problem. So that there is less buggy problem reported once the BookSmart app release to the general public.
However, I recognize that BookSmart itself is still a beta stage, so I can’t say much about that. However I would stronly encourage that Blurb software engineering team (and the management) to reexamine the priorities around improving BookSmart – to make it a better application. The rest is up to Blurb.
|