Welcome Sign out
Shopping Cart My Account Order History Sign in Not yet a member? Help

Book Printing

iphoto vs. Blurb quality

I recently made a book in iphoto, and was quite pleased. However, they have a 100 page max and I want to make to a book with 400, which is why I am going the Blurb route now. Can anyone compare the quality of iphoto books vs. Blurb books? Thanks!

Replytopic_b_normal
Posted by
caybear2
Feb 1, 2008 9:31am PDT
Permalink
caybear2
 

I have made a few books with iPhoto 7 (‘08).
The quality is similar. I prefer the BookSmart software despite the as yet, unresolved text bugs.
The color on my Blurb book that featured photos of artwork, as opposed to actual photographs, was more accurate.
I assume this is due to soft proofing in Photoshop with the available HP printer profile.
I also prefer the glossy cover on the blurb book.
Having never printed books with hundreds of pages, I can’t comment on the construction of the binding.

Posted by
TomM
Feb 1, 2008 10:40am PDT
Permalink
TomM
 

I will second Tom on his comments,

I think a major reason is the fact that you get the chance to softproof with Blurb. With Iphoto, there is no information on the type of press they use or the sharpening recommendations.

Posted by
dennysb
Feb 12, 2008 10:01am PDT
Permalink
dennysb
 

I too prefer the blub book to the iphoto.  I used the same prep process for both books, with the same images.  The iphoto book just did not "pop" like the blurb book.  Also, almost every page of the iphoto book had lines/marks which you could tell were rollers that ran across the pages.  On color photos these marks were not so bad, but on black and whites the roller marks were terrible.

Posted by
martyallen2
Feb 14, 2008 7:15pm PDT
Permalink
martyallen2
 

For those who use Macintoshes and are using iPhoto ‘08 app fairly regularly, I use Aperture app for quite some time, more than a year now – almost two years, I believe.

Apple officially release Aperture 2 (as in version 2) for purchase as of today. I went straight to one of Apple stores in Manhattan here in New York City earlier today and purchased upgraded version. I like Aperture version 2 a lot better than legacy version such as Aperture 1.5.6.

Aperture 2 is quite powerful photo editing and management application. I am dealing with thousands, thousands of digital photos on my Macs (MacPro and MacBook Pro, and a couple of external hard drives as back ups).

Generally, Aperture photo books are nicer than iPhoto ‘08 photo books. One thing is very nice about Leopard (Mac system architecture – version 10.5.2) is more seamless system to move or transfer photos, or even movies or audio (I don’t use audio files because I am deaf – lol). You can move photos quite literally between Aperture and iPhoto seamlessly, as would with iWorks or iDVD or other apps on Macs.

Aperture, in generally, are designed for professional photographer’s toolbox. For those who use WIndows platform, sorry to say that Aperture is Mac version only. But there is alternative, similar app called Adobe Lightroom. Lightroom is Mac and Windows friendly application.

Some individuals have different opinions about Lightroom and Aperture. It is all about individual’s preference, comfort zone, and it depends on what kind of computer they use, and depends on individual’s specific scope – professional or for fun or as hobby.

I like both, Aperture and Lightroom. But I find Aperture 2 is much nicer, more coolly and really neato app!

As for preference about iPhoto or Aperture or Blurb books, it really depends on individual’s preference – comfort zone. It might not be for everyone. It works nicely for person “A” that he/she likes iPhoto photo book better. Other person “b” prefers Aperture Book better. Other person “c” likes Blurb. In my case, I like both – Blurb and Aperture/iPhoto books.

The catch is that Aperture do not make calenders or something, but you can transfer photo files over to iPhoto 08 and make calenders or some cutey post cards or something like that.

The thing I like Aperture 2 is more powerful printing feature. i am not going into that area, too complicated. Since it is not related to BLurb topic. But that is something else, though.

It is just that it depends on what kind of book project you are talking about. Because there are different layout design, book size and things like that.

iPhoto 08 books and its designs, generally, pretty much basically a lot better than old iPhoto book design in the past.

The thing is iPhoto 08 is limited to 100 sheets (50 pages) I believe.

Posted by
brianbonitz
Feb 14, 2008 9:59pm PDT
Permalink
brianbonitz
 

You are right you can find people on either side that like Aperture or Lightroom.

In my case, I have used both and consider Lightroom a much more complete organizer/editor and image management apps. But again is just my opinion.

That said, whether you end-up using Aperture or Lightroom, it does not change the fact that Blurb seems to be a more complete and flexible system for creating book than Iphoto’s books

Posted by
dennysb
Feb 20, 2008 4:32pm PDT
Permalink
dennysb