Welcome Sign out
Shopping Cart My Account Order History Sign in Not yet a member? Help

poetress's Posts

beware of softbooks and bad customer service
BookSmart

I bought one hard cover and one soft cover of the same 24 page book I made.  The soft cover quality in printing was not even close to being as good as the hard cover.  I also purchased 4 other hard bound books at the time of the soft cover purchase and those were great.  I am not planning on offering the soft cover version.  It just wasn’t any good and my printer at home would have done better.  The hardcover rocks though!

Posted by
poetress
Jul 31, 2007 12:42pm PST
Permalink
poetress
 
Photo Quality Not What I Expected; Please Allow PDFs or EPS Files
Book Printing

I have made my photography into 5 hardbound books.  All of them were very close to my monitor colors.  I shoot digital.  All my pictures are high end 8.0 JPGs to begin with and I do very little touching up in Photoshop.  I hate raw.  Maybe I’m just lucky…some of the photos were even better in the book than in some of the prints.  I was highly impressed with the quality.  I was not impressed with the softcover edition of my book, though.  Its printing was lacking.  All my pictures are pretty much full bleed and I have several black and white photos that I made from color pictures.  I used Nik Pro though.  I haven’t had a problem with the purple.  Perhaps the people that have a problem with the book are just used to something different?  The books I received were excellent, now that doesn’t mean that the next set will be, but from what I’ve ordered and gotten it has been worth it and my test subjects all enjoy the end product.  And I agree LuLu isn’t great for picture printing…but they offer ISBN and a distribution package that is great for just plain print.  I wish Blurb would take from their lead and combine the great aspects of each company. 

Posted by
poetress
Jul 31, 2007 12:30pm PST
Permalink
poetress
 
Copyright Issues
General Interest

The best thing to do is to call the Copyright Office, go to their main web page and there is a phone number you can call to get to speak to an employee that can answer your questions.  Yes, you will need to get permission from the copyright holder to use those photographs.  Copyright lasts the entire life time of the person plus a certain amount of time after that.  Unless your pictures fall into the "public domain" where copyright has expired you can’t publish the work without the permission of the original copyright holder.

 As far as permission of the people in the pictures, the original photographer should have gotten a release for any person that is identifiable.  You have to get permission of the copyright holder to use it and that probably is the actual photographer of the imaget, so I would assume that the release would extend if you get permission.  I don’t think this applies if the picture is taken for "news related" purposes.   This is the grey area where the tabloids get in trouble for publishing pictures of stars without their consent and often have to pay big bucks for the pictures.   

 Copyright is confusing, but it is not as bad as it seems when you read for hours at a time.  I believe the site is www.copyright.org.  If you google it, you will want to follow the link to the US Copyright Office.  It probably is the first one that pops up. 

If you go to the Copyright webpage there are lots of FAQs and good examples of items and if you are still confused calling them is often very helpful.   

Posted by
poetress
Jul 31, 2007 12:17pm PST
Permalink
poetress